Local elections carried out on Sunday in Ukraine were
described as a test of Poroshenko’s government.
In the event, the electorate has given the government a free pass for
now.
Turnout was low (seeming to average around 40%), there were
no major disruptions (though balloting in Mariupol was canceled and will have
to be done later), and parties of the extreme right or left did not sweep into
power. The worst that can be said is
that a seeming reversion in the east to parities supported by parochial,
oligarchic interests is not a good sign for civil society.
Despite widespread public distrust of government and
dissatisfaction with the economy, the electorate, by not showing up and by not
voting for extremists is giving the government the option to reform before
getting punished in subsequent elections.
Local electoral contests financed by oligarchic interests
and/or restructured political machines, and involving fraud and overt electoral
manipulation--such as between Borys Filatov, backed by oligarchic Ihor
Kolomoisky, and Oleksandr Vilkul, the Russia leaning descendent of the Yanukovych
era Party of the Regions backed by Oligarchic Rinat Akhmetov--do not instill
confidence in the integrity of the electoral process or the legitimacy of
government.
For Ukraine to move forward, whoever wins needs the
credibility of a reasonably fair election process that reflects the wider
interests of civil society. Neither
Filatov nor Vilkul have that.
To endure, and for the sake of a strong civil society, the
Poroshenko government has to make progress on three reform fronts,
- · The corruption agenda, especially judicial reform where the principles of sound corporate and public governance are established and defended,
- · The economic agenda, especially the need to separate politics and business based in law, supportive economic policies and transperancy.
- · The political agenda, where reform is essential to build a credible civil society. Indeed, the incumbents need it most if government is to gain credibility and legitimacy.
Poroshenko needs to deliver a cleaner election process next
time around through an uninterrupted reform process.
An excellent break down of Sunday’s election results and
implications by freelance journalist Oliver Carroll can be found at http://www.politico.eu/article/petro-poroshenko-hobbles-on-ukraine-local-election-vote-rigging/
No comments:
Post a Comment